🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are watching closely to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

In Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation could be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media users. Officials have suggested that an similar ban is "one of the measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to enact a bill raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is provided. While it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not create binding law.

"An effective age limit is a good first step," commented one MEP driving the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "based on strong evidence".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Charities have raised concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with additional time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills demanding guardian approval for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain politicians to follow Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Apart from the West, additional nations are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world agencies adopt a more measured position. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

As this global discussion continues, the policies of Australia and its followers indicate that governments internationally are less and less willing to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.